Blind vs. mainstream distros
Linux for blind general discussion
blinux-list at redhat.com
Tue May 2 11:36:03 UTC 2017
Tony Baechler here.
On 5/1/2017 10:58 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> I'm not arguing that specialized distros are necessarily better or even
> needed. What I am saying is that if a distro is going to make releases
> with builtin accessibility, they better have someone on their release
> team who knows how it works and tests it on each release to make sure
> that it doesn't bitrot.
Yes, absolutely! This is the problem I had with Gentoo. It worked great in
2007, but I couldn't tell if it even had any way to start speech when I
checked a year or two ago. I didn't see anything to indicate that software
speech is on the CD. That further illustrates my point that the nonprofit
organization which needs to be formed, in addition to filing bugs against
inaccessible packages and working with upstream developers, needs to get
representatives on as many distros' accessibility and development teams as
possible. Debian is in good shape, but Ubuntu could certainly use help.
Don't get me started on Fedora again. There are, as others have said, lots
of niche distros which have no accessibility. Kyle mentioned Mint for
example, although Mint runs the Cinnamon desktop, so it's unsurprising that
it wouldn't ship Orca. I read that they said they would ship Orca in the
future, but again, who knows if they will, if anyone actually tests it and
if it gets updated as new releases come out.
More information about the Blinux-list