Prospects for an accessible and open version of Android?
Linux for blind general discussion
blinux-list at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 09:59:48 UTC 2020
I'd agree it's not an optimal solution, and I'm unaware whether there's
a better configuration option available with mailman; however, it is
intentional and was put in place to solve a problem we encountered a few years ago.
Now, having said this much, I regret I don't remember the particulars of
the problem we were solving at the time. I only remember that the
current behavior solved the issue.
Perhaps someone else on list may have better recall of the problem back
then? I recall only that it was a big deal for some reason.
Linux for blind general discussion writes:
> > On Jun 14, 2020, at 13:23, Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com> wrote:
> > What is a ‘settings issue’?
> > Are you meaning a problem with settings?
> Yes. On all of my other mailing lists, the identity of the sender is given in the From line. In some cases, the email address is obfuscated, but I still know who sent the message. In this list, all of the From lines say "On ..., Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com> wrote:". I find this confusing, because I can't tell who's saying what (unless they happen to end their post with a signature).
> If this mailing list behavior is intentional, please let me know and I'll live with it. If it isn't, perhaps the settings on the mailing list need to be modified.
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
More information about the Blinux-list