"Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
Linux for blind general discussion
blinux-list at redhat.com
Sun Aug 14 01:47:20 UTC 2022
And your employment track record?
On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
> In my work, the client got what ever they needed.
> We never forced Windows or Jaws on them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen at shellworld.net>
> To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn at ervin.email>
> Cc: <speakup at linux-speakup.org>; "Milan Zamazal" <pdm at zamazal.org>;
> <Blinux-list at redhat.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 3:26 PM
> Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
> And how often do clients get a choice about their tools?
> Support this with objective documentation, as this is your professional
> industry, if memory serves.
> I recall on more than one occasion being provided with documentation where
> jaws was the only screen reader choice a client was given.
> Know of at least one professional who turned to Linux because they never
> wanted to use Jaws or windows again.
> since rehab holds the money strings for fs, it is up to the counselors to
> prove, with numbers, that it is worth the financial investment for
> freedom scientific.
> My understanding is that nvda came into being because clients wanted more
> choices than Jaws, and counselors were resistant.
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
>> True enough, but largely, rehab people typically use Windows at work, and
>> probably at home, but they need to cater to the needs of the client.
>> If a client used Linux, I doubt that any rehab counselor would advocate
>> the client switch to Windows, unless that was needed for a specific job.
>> In Nebraska, we purchased Jaws much more for personal use than we did for
>> work related situations.
>> So if FS made a JFL, and people were using Linux, rehab would indeed
>> purchase a JFL product.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>> To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn at ervin.email>
>> Cc: <speakup at linux-speakup.org>; "Milan Zamazal" <pdm at zamazal.org>;
>> <Blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 3:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
>> there was an interesting discussion a month or so back on the blinux list
>> about how long it took completing tasks in the gui as apposed to say
>> command line, the comments were quite informative.
>> Still, fs has never marketed largely to the end user. Instead they market
>> to the American rehab community.
>> how much market research has the rehab community done to support the need
>> for choices?
>> How many rehab counselors support training in Linux?
>> one comment made by the subject of this thread about poor quality speech
>> is a fine one...out of the box Linux has few speech choices. everyone
>> brings their needs to the table there.
>> if you want to get fs to care about Linux, you need to prove there is
>> money for them there, from their main source of income.
>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
>>> Well since Orca seems to work on so many distros, I don't know why FS
>>> not be able to do the same.
>>> If Jaws users could switch into Linux, it would be a real game changer,
>>> I think with lots more Blind Linux users, we would start seeing
>>> accessibility in Linux not being a second thought.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Karen Lewellen" <klewellen at shellworld.net>
>>> To: "K0LNY_Glenn" <glenn at ervin.email>
>>> Cc: <speakup at linux-speakup.org>; "Milan Zamazal" <pdm at zamazal.org>;
>>> <Blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 1:47 PM
>>> Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
>>> Well technically freedom scientific does not exist any longer, being
>>> by another company.
>>> Still, I can respect why they, or nvda have not created their tools for
>>> That is because as I understand it, Linux is quite like clay. You can
>>> mold a distribution into almost anything. there are various
>>> personifications of the system, all sorts of ways and changes and options
>>> for creativity.
>>> however adaptive tools are often extensions of physical characteristics,
>>> hands, eyes, ears, brains, combinations of these.
>>> To build solid assistive tools one must have a solid foundation as it
>>> were. that is part of why there have needed to be so few Apple efforts
>>> inclusion, they created with, and then created in-house adaptive tools
>>> for various populations that were built into the system.
>>> Although Microsoft did not bother until much later, in theory at least,
>>> consistency of windows is what makes it possible for freedom or the
>>> gw micro or nvda to create something that can in theory work.
>>> Floor for the furniture is somewhat solid.
>>> Just my thoughts,
>>> On Sat, 13 Aug 2022, K0LNY_Glenn wrote:
>>>> I would like to see Freedom Scientific make a Jaws For Linux.
>>>> I'd certainly pay the yearly rental fee for it, and it would bring many
>>>> users into Linux.
>>>> FS could, with its resources, possibly make it more robust than Orca.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Milan Zamazal" <pdm at zamazal.org>
>>>> To: <speakup at linux-speakup.org>
>>>> Cc: <Blinux-list at redhat.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 12:08 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: "Accessibility in Fedora Workstation" (fwd)
>>>>>>>>> "KL" == Karen Lewellen <klewellen at shellworld.net> writes:
>>>> KL> What bothers me most are his lack of actual qualifications, and
>>>> KL> absolute dismissal of what he has not experienced..as if he
>>>> KL> defines Linux usage for everyone. That attitude is dangerous,
>>>> KL> because he is educating those outside of the accessibility
>>>> KL> experiences, who will believe his ignorance is factual. he has
>>>> KL> to be expert, it is his job.
>>>> Hi Karen,
>>>> I know Lukas personally and I admire his skills and qualifications. I
>>>> also know first hand that he is open to constructive feedback and I
>>>> believe he’d be happy to be corrected about possible technical
>>>> inaccuracies in the interview. It may be also a good opportunity to
>>>> find out what’s possibly missing in making anybody better informed.
>>>> As for “absolute dismissal of what he has not experienced”, what
>>>> reasonable free software alternatives to a less or more standard desktop
>>>> with Orca and a software synthesizer can you see for a common blind user
>>>> who needs to use a fully working web browser, to read and process text
>>>> documents, to be compatible with other computer users, etc.?
>>>> And let’s be realistic. We celebrate every single developer hired to
>>>> improve accessibility. This tells something about the state of the
>>>> matters. We cannot expect that a single person will fix all the kinds
>>>> of accessibility problems in all the environments. Lukas works at his
>>>> job focusing on certain areas currently seen there as urgent ones and I
>>>> appreciate this opportunity. Anybody else seeing a need to work on
>>>> other areas is welcome to contribute to whatever sees fit, as I do.
More information about the Blinux-list