Coqui TTS has blew my mind!

[Linux for blind general discussion]

Well, I just call it a fallback link because this is what it kinda does. 
If a browser doesn't support the HTML5 audio tag, and by 2022 they all 
should, my code falls back to displaying links that can be clicked to 
download the selected title. . So this is an example of the HTML5 audio 
tag that I use whenever I put a new song or recording up on my website

<audio
     title="Something Interesting Here"
     controls="controls">
     <source src="/music/Kyle%20-%20Something%20Interesting%20Here.opus" 
type="audio/ogg; codecs=opus" />
     <source src="/music/Kyle%20-%20Something%20Interesting%20Here.ogg" 
type="audio/ogg; codecs=vorbis" />
     Something Interesting Here
     <a 
href="/music/Kyle%20-%20Something%20Interesting%20Here.opus">96kbps 
Opus</a> |
     <a href="/music/Kyle%20-%20Something%20Interesting%20Here.ogg">q4 
Vorbis</a>

     </audio>


You will immediately notice some text, along with two <a> tags, embedded 
in the <audio> tag below the <source> tags. The specification for the 
HTML5 audio tag indicates that anything between <audio> and </audio> 
that is not a source is ignored by HTML5-compatible browsers. 
Conversely, browsers that do not support HTML5 simply ignore the tags 
they can't understand, which are <audio> ... </audio> and the <source 
tags in between, but they display anything they do understand, in this 
case, the text that is the title of the song and the <a> tags that are 
the download links, in 96Kb/s opus and Q3 Ogg Vorbis formats. Now that 
mp3 is officially free of all patents, I need to revisit this code and 
add mp3 streams and downloads to this code as well, so that I can 
officially support most free lossy codecs depending on what the end user 
has available, as I can be fairly certain that nearly all visitors to my 
website will have at least opus, vorbis and/or mp3 codecs available to 
play my recorded work. The thing to note is that anything that appears 
between <audio> and </audio or <video> and </video> that is not a source 
tag is ignored by HTML5 browsers, but is displayed by HTML4 browsers. It 
is considered fallback text because this is its function. It is also 
worth noting however that although fallback text is part of the <audio> 
and <video> tag specifications, it is not at all required, either for 
accessibility or for usability. I just added this fallback text 
including the download links just as I added multiple codec sources, so 
that as many people as possible would be able to stream and/or download 
my recordings. Again, it was a personal decision, not a requirement or 
even a guideline suggested or imposed by any standards body. But I do 
hope this explains what fallback text is, or fallback links, their usage 
and benefits, how this can be applied, and just how easy it actually is 
to apply such fallback HTML to existing standard player code.

~Kyle