Accessibility of installing Distros?
Linux for blind general discussion
blinux-list at redhat.com
Wed Feb 16 15:47:37 UTC 2022
Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> Not sure what's so "non-official" about them, since they're packaged
> by the Debian iso team.
They are non-official as is: non-free is not part of Debian.
That's the uneasy middle-ground that Debian uses between the GNU
approach which is to ban firmwares entirely (to the point of refusing
to say that they exist), and installing non-free firmware by default
without the user being aware at all that non-free firmware are a concern
for our freedom.
More information about the Blinux-list