Accessibility of installing Distros?

Linux for blind general discussion blinux-list at
Wed Feb 16 15:47:37 UTC 2022

Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> Not sure  what's so "non-official" about them, since they're packaged
> by the Debian iso team.

They are non-official as is: non-free is not part of Debian.

That's the uneasy middle-ground that Debian uses between the GNU
approach which is to ban firmwares entirely (to the point of refusing
to say that they exist), and installing non-free firmware by default
without the user being aware at all that non-free firmware are a concern
for our freedom.


More information about the Blinux-list mailing list