Mutt or Alpine

[Linux for blind general discussion]

If you want to use an email client with Orca, stick to Thunderbird.

I find Orca unwieldy in the terminal anyway.

If, however, you wish to do so with Speakup or Fenrir, I personally prefer 
Alpine.

Why? Simple. I don't know Mutt at all.

Warm regards,

Brandt Steenkamp

Sent from the Slint console using Alpine

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:

> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:00:22 +0000
> From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
> Subject: Mutt or Alpine
> 
> So I'm using Mutt, but...
>
> What does Mutt have over Alpine and vice versa, why would I use one over the 
> other?
>
> Mutt seems faster to me, but Alpine seems more user friendly without making 
> temporary files while composing a message (unles I can tell Mutt/Neomutt to 
> delete those automatically
>
> So is there a consensus of which is the easier choice to use with Orca?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>
>