Mutt or Alpine

[Linux for blind general discussion]

My issue with Alpine though is it's losing my IMAP mails, like I've 
several with attachments that Alpine skips right over and Mutt displays 
fine however, so I'm not sure if that's a problem with Alpine? My Gmail 
terminal setup works fine in Mutt however, which is doubly weird

Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
> If you want to use an email client with Orca, stick to Thunderbird.
>
> I find Orca unwieldy in the terminal anyway.
>
> If, however, you wish to do so with Speakup or Fenrir, I personally 
> prefer Alpine.
>
> Why? Simple. I don't know Mutt at all.
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Brandt Steenkamp
>
> Sent from the Slint console using Alpine
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
>
>> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:00:22 +0000
>> From: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list at redhat.com>
>> Subject: Mutt or Alpine
>>
>> So I'm using Mutt, but...
>>
>> What does Mutt have over Alpine and vice versa, why would I use one 
>> over the other?
>>
>> Mutt seems faster to me, but Alpine seems more user friendly without 
>> making temporary files while composing a message (unles I can tell 
>> Mutt/Neomutt to delete those automatically
>>
>> So is there a consensus of which is the easier choice to use with Orca?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blinux-list mailing list
>> Blinux-list at redhat.com
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> Blinux-list at redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>