[Bugzilla-announce-list] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Red Hat Bugzilla 3.6 Upgrade Public Beta

[David Lawrence]

No, it's a perl template that has a variable in it [% terms.Bugzilla %]
where "Red Hat Bugzilla" shows up. Whereever that variable shows up in the
Bugzilla templates, it replaces it with that value so it just happens
to be in that paragraph as well.

Dave


On 7/21/10 3:52 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 21.7.2010 00:13, David Lawrence napsal(a):
>> Please file any enhancement requests or bug reports in our current
>> Bugzilla system at https://bugzilla.redhat.com . File them under the
>> Bugzilla product and relevant component with the version 3.6. With
>> everyone's help we can make this a great release.
>
> Not sure whether it is wrong and whether it deserves a bug, but sentence
>
>> We would like to thank Canonical Ltd., ITA Software, the IBM Linux
>> Technology Center, Red Hat, and Novell for funding the development of
>> various features and improvements in this release of Red Hat
>> Bugzilla.
>
> This is probably just phrasing or something, but Novell sponsoring
> improvements of Red Hat Bugzilla feels weird. It seems to me there is
> somewhere something confusing about missing distinction between upstream
> Bugzilla development and our bugzilla instance. Also thanking ourselves
> for improvements in our own bugzilla ...
>
> I guess there was some sed command involved here, right?
>
> Matěj
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bugzilla-announce-list mailing list
> Bugzilla-announce-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-announce-list

-- 
David Lawrence, RHCE  dkl at redhat.com
------------------------------------
Red Hat, Inc.    Web: www.redhat.com
1801 Varsity Drive Raleigh, NC 27606

What happens when open source way is applied to the world? http://opensource.com