[Container-tools] Package ELK stack example using Atomicapp

Daniel Riek riek at redhat.com
Mon Jun 8 14:44:27 UTC 2015


Or so I thought...

On 06/08/2015 10:16 AM, Daniel Riek wrote:
> Adding bill who is coordinating our log aggregation / analysis work
> across tje products and was looking for volunteers for this.
>
>
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: John Mark Walker <jowalker at redhat.com>
> Date:06/08/2015 09:17 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at redhat.com>
> Cc: container-tools at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Container-tools] Package ELK stack example using Atomicapp
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 08/06/15 09:18, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
> > > On 06/08/2015 12:31 PM, Archit Sharma wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> So an idea came up to package the ELK stack [1] (which seems to
> > >> be a common use-case) using atomic app, and then we could add it
> > >> as an example under |nulecule/examples/|.
> > >>
> > >> I'm willing to become a secondary owner for this issue, under
> > >> guidance from a primary one, since I don't have much knowledge of
> > >> atomicapp. I've raised an issue for the same [2].
> > >>
> > >> Thoughts?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Sounds interesting to me. Though I am not an expert in Nulecule as
> > > of now, but I want to give it a try.
> > >
> > >> Refs: [1] https://www.elastic.co/webinars/introduction-elk-stack
> > >> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/issues/99
> > >>
> > >> Cheers, Archit Sharma Associate Performance Engineer /
> > >> [RHCE/RHCSA]
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > Well, the ELK stack is interesting, but will probably not be the
> > easiest one either.
> > all components from the ELK stack aren't really available directly as
> > RPM packages, except if we consider the ones available "upstream"
> > (directly at Elasticsearch) but not really "packaged" but rather just
> > combined into .rpm through fpm.
>
> This is true, but not relevant for Nulecule purposes. I don't think we
> want "lack of RPMs" to be a blocker to packaging for Atomic App.
>
> Getting the software from upstream is easy enough, and we have quite a
> few connections to Elastic to help us if we need it. In fact, we
> should just start looping them in.
>
> -JM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20150608/199b4397/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20150608/199b4397/attachment.sig>


More information about the Container-tools mailing list