[Container-tools] docker container based installers for Atomic / OpenShift V3 / GKE et al (was Re: Container App Spec and Tooling

James Strachan jstracha at redhat.com
Fri May 1 08:39:40 UTC 2015


> On 1 May 2015, at 09:36, Jimmi Dyson <jdyson at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> 
>> You are right, good idea!! //G
>> 
>> On 04/30/2015 04:17 PM, James Strachan wrote:
>>>>> TBH I’m currently leaning towards using OpenShift Templates
>>>>> everywhere; so there’s only 1 provider;
>>>> 
>>>> That's ok. If you want to support only OpenShift than do so.
>>> 
>>> I think you missed my point. An OpenShift template can be used on
>>> any Kubernetes environment at all - including Atomic and GKE. Since
>>> an OpenShift template is a client side preprocessor; it outputs
>>> vanilla Kubernetes JSON
> 
> Aren't templates actually processed server side? I've just tried processing it without a connection to a running master & the client throws an error trying to post to /osapi/v1beta3/templateConfigs.

Ah is that new in v1beta3? Either way, doing a bit of search/replace on some property expressions in the JSON is pretty trivial to do client side right? 

James
-------
Red Hat

Twitter: @jstrachan
Email: jstracha at redhat.com <mailto:jstracha at redhat.com>
Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ <http://macstrac.blogspot.com/>

hawtio: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/hawt.io/ <http://hawt.io/>
fabric8: http:/ <http://fusesource.com/>/fabric8.io/ <http://fabric8.io/>

Open Source Integration
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20150501/71f0ade4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Container-tools mailing list