[Container-tools] Proposal for projectatomic/adb-utils Git repo

[Brian (bex) Exelbierd]

On Jan 25, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 01/25/2016 05:14 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 01/22/2016 03:38 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> We need an RPM to contain the utility scripts that drive the ADB.
>>>> These scripts do things like certificate generation.  This is also
>>>> where the service files for the various orchestrators will live.
>>>> 
>>>> To make it easy for downstream maintainers and to assist in builds, we
>>>> propse that a new git repo be started under projectatomic.  The repo
>>>> will be named *adb-utils* and will have the same maintainers as the
>>>> ADB.
>>>> 
>>>> This repo will allow us to clean up the Kickstart files for the ADB
>>>> and create an easier to maintain script repo.
>>>> 
>>>> Any suggestions/concerns?  Any objections?  If not, I suggest we
>>>> accept lazy consensus on Wednesday Jan 27 at 0000 UTC.
>>>> 
>>> The only objection is the name, the prefix adb makes it not convenient when
>>> used with CDK. It will confuse the user with respect to what is ADB vs CDK.
>> It will go as package so in downstream we have dist-git as 'cdk-utils'
>> but code-base will be same like we do for kickstart files so that
>> should not be a problem/confusion.
>> 
> 
> Yes, I thought of that. But the model does not work well for Vagrant plugins e.g. vagrant-adbinfo.

True, but this isn't a vagrant plugin.  This is a support RPM.

Let's keep the naming wars separate :)

/me heads off to invade the East in the Winter :)