[Container-tools] [atomic-devel] Landing pages

[Matt Micene]

The current swing at a Vagrant based doc is here:

https://github.com/nzwulfin/atomic-site/blob/vagrant/source/docs/vagrant_installation.md

Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're
> familiar with Vagrant or not?


That's also another topic that came in the original discussion is how many
X Guides at all levels to we need?  Virtualbox vs Libvirt? Vagrant vs Adv
Vagrant? Fedora vs Centos?

Here's the discussion that happened on IRC a billion Internet years ago:

https://gist.github.com/nzwulfin/022dc7438a8f43a999df


Open to comments and questions

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Jonathan Lebon <jlebon at redhat.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > I agree and am claiming responsibility here. We have an arguably better
> > experience available currently for Fedora Atomic via Vagrant.
>
> This is something that I've been trying to address with
> Developer Mode as well, although I can see both of them
> serving their purpose. E.g. Vagrant is much nicer if folks
> are already set up for it, while Developer Mode is nice for
> first timers who don't want that upfront investment of
> setting up and learning Vagrant just to try out Atomic.
>
> > So, excuses aside, I'll put together a new Super Quick Start Guide
> > highlighting the vagrant builds that Dusty and Jason have worked hard on
> > putting together.
>
> Could we have two Quick Starts depending on if they're
> familiar with Vagrant or not? Or would that be too confusing
> to present?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20160129/0d59eb01/attachment.htm>