[Container-tools] Distribution method for Openshift2Nulecule

[Pete Muir]

What plans do we have to integrate openshift2nulecule in to OpenShift
itself (AFAIK this is the "export" feature).

On 9 March 2016 at 14:16, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 10:30 PM, Tomas Kral wrote:
>>
>> After issues [1] [2] we had with getting Openshift2Nulecule [3] to ADB I
>> had discussion with Suraj about distributing Openshift2Nulecule only as
>> container(similar to Atomic App) rather then as rpm package.
>
>
> We need both. The reason is we have users for both. For example Atomic App
> have both. We have it in Fedora and EPEL.
>
>
>> I'm interested in your thoughts about this.
>>
>> Advantages:
>> - separate release cycle from ADB
>> - no more issues with dependencies
>> - consistent interface of atomic cli for the end user.
>>
>>
>> Disadvantages:
>>   - might require specifying more command line options
>>   - all exported files are going to be owned by root
>>   - Extra docker image need to be pulled which is larger than rpm package
>> (this will be one time download)
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/279#issuecomment-193841621
>> [2] https://github.com/projectatomic/openshift2nulecule/issues/21
>> [3] https://github.com/projectatomic/openshift2nulecule/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Container-tools mailing list
>> Container-tools at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Container-tools mailing list
> Container-tools at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/container-tools