[Container-tools] atomicapp regresses with Docker 1.10

Stef Walter stefw at redhat.com
Fri Mar 11 05:55:54 UTC 2016


On 11.03.2016 04:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 10 March 2016 at 19:28, Stef Walter <stefw at redhat.com> wrote:
>> This is a heads up that docker 1.10 breaks API in various ways. It broke
>> kubernetes among other things.
> 
> Huh, would a plausible symptom of that be "kubectl get node" reporting
> a Docker 1.10 node as Not Ready, even though "curl -L
> http://127.0.0.1:10248/healthz" on the node itself reports "ok"?
> 
> $ rpm -qa docker kubernetes
> kubernetes-1.2.0-0.13.alpha6.gitf0cd09a.fc23.x86_64
> docker-1.10.2-5.git0f5ac89.fc23.x86_64
> 
> I'd been assuming there was something wrong with my node config,
> rather than looking for bugs or incompatibilities.

The kubernetes + docker 1.0 breakage I was referring to is limited to
kubectl exec and kubectl logs.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311861

However this kubernetes package regression seems suspiciously similar to
what you're talking about:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316424

Both solved by later kubernetes RPM builds. Thanks to Jan.

By the way the Cockpit integration tests is the thing that has been
finding all these issues. So we end up being a clearing house for
regressions on the APIs that Cockpit touches :S

Cheers,

Stef

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/container-tools/attachments/20160311/c01143bb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Container-tools mailing list