[Crash-utility] Miscellaneous fixes/enhancements to crash 4.0-2.10(fwd)

Dave Anderson anderson at redhat.com
Fri Nov 18 18:46:31 UTC 2005


Castor Fu wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Dave Anderson wrote:
>
> > Dave Anderson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Well, first off, it's kind of stupid to run the same .crashrc file twice,
> >> isn't it?  I shall fix that oversight henceforth...
>
> Yes, I suppose so, but I was actually seeing this first with
> a local .crashrc...
>

Right -- you were seeing it when the local .crashrc *was* also $HOME/.crashrc.
So it was executed twice, first as the $HOME version, and subsequently as
the local version.

>
> >>
> >> That leaves the case where "bt -O" is set in both the $HOME and
> >> local .crashrc files.  Whereas the local .crashrc is meant to override
> >> whatever might be in the $HOME .crashrc, the "bt -O" case still wants
> >> to be idempotent.  That can be addressed by a little tinkering with cmd_bt(),
> >> because the pc->flags will have RCHOME_IFILE or RCLOCAL_IFILE
> >> set when it's executing those .crashrc commands.
> >>
> >> With those two fixes in hand, we can keep "bt -O" simple-minded.
> >
> > There's also the potential case of the command line "-i inputfile" option.
> > But the initialization-time rule should still apply -- if "bt -O" is contained in
> > any or all of the 3 possible initialization-time input files ($HOME/.crashrc,
> > ./.crashrc, or "-i inputfile" files), the setting will remain idempotent.
> >
> > I also fixed the redundant running of $HOME/.crashrc and ./.crashrc
> > files if they are the same file.
>
> Just so I understand, what you're saying is that if 'bt -O' is specified
> in an initialization file, it always means 'use old' otherwise it's a toggle?

Right -- it's only toggle-able during runtime.

Dave





More information about the Crash-utility mailing list