[Crash-utility] crash version 4.0-2.22 is available

[Nguyen Anh Quynh]

hi Dave,

is there any good reason not to include Xen header files into crash
code? (for ex, i see that you have copied few Xen structures from
xenctrl.h)

other thing: would it be better if you put the Changelog file into the
source tree?

btw, we would love to see the "TODO" list, if you have any. those who
are interested will know what is in the priority list, and might help
out. what do you think?

thanks.
Q

On 3/24/06, Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> - Incorporated initial patch-set to implement support for kernels built
>   with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM.  (dwilder at us.ibm.com)
>
> - Fix for post-2.6.15 ppc64 kernels to use cpu_online_map when perusing
>   the paca array for the per_cpu_offsets.  (haren at us.ibm.com)
>
> - Fix for ppc64 "bt" command for active tasks that were running in
>   user space at the time of crash.  (haren at us.ibm.com)
>
> - Fix to remove dependencies upon any kernel header files so as to
>   allow crash to build in a Ubuntu environment.  (aquynh at gmail.com)
>
> - Fix size of x86_64 "cpu_khz" variable to match that of the kernel.
>   (sharyath at in.ibm.com)
>
> - Created framework for support of Xen kernel dumpfiles and live Xen
>   kernels; this is going to be a long-period work-in-progress affair,
>   and the code added in this release is being done now primarily to aid
>   in future patch integration efforts.  (anderson at redhat.com)
>
> Download from:  http://people.redhat.com/anderson
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
>
>
>


--
regards,
Quynh