[Crash-utility] Re: Crash-utility Digest, Vol 28, Issue 4

[baiwd]

Luc:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:36:53 -0500
> From: Luc Chouinard <lchouinard at trueposition.com>
> Subject: Re: [Crash-utility] sial.c's apigetctype
> To: Discussion "list for crash utility usage,	maintenance and
> 	development" <crash-utility at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1199972213.18723.3.camel at NgVboss2>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Bai, those code paths have been fine tuned based on my limited
> understanding of the gdb type information layout. You cannot use a 'fall
> through' in this switch. It's a one to one match test.
>
> What's behind your question? Are you having problems with a script
> and/or symbol/type resolution? If so, send us/me a test case.
>
>     Luc
>   
        I am very sorry for misunderstanding the meaning of your codes. 
You are right,
break could not be deleted. Thank you for your providing this tool and 
your expaining.