[Crash-utility] [PATCH] Use backtrace() instead of __builtin_return_address()

[Bernhard Walle]

* Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> [2008-05-14 11:51]:
> Bernhard Walle wrote:
> > 
> > * Dave Anderson [2008-05-14 11:11]:
> >> I suppose we could go with 5 instead of 4, and have dump_trace()
> >> skip the first one, presuming that this anomoly is not architecture-
> >> or compiler-dependent.  Or maybe make it macro?
> > 
> > Did you compile with some optimisation? I think I remember that gcc
> > only inlines code with optimisation turned on.
> > 
> 
> No -- the Makefile is used as is -- you're the one modifying things...  ;-)

You distribute crash without optimisations in Fedora/RHEL? Well, our
build system complains in that case. :-|


	Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/attachments/20080514/946207eb/attachment.sig>