[Crash-utility] Re: crash 4.0-8.9 w/ 2.6.30-rc6
Mike Snitzer
snitzer at redhat.com
Wed May 27 12:52:13 UTC 2009
On Wed, May 27 2009 at 8:37am -0400,
Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ----- "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > crash is failing with the following when I try to throw a 2.6.30-rc6
> > vmcore at it:
> >
> > crash: invalid structure size: x8664_pda
> > FILE: x86_64.c LINE: 584 FUNCTION: x86_64_cpu_pda_init()
> >
> > [/usr/bin/crash] error trace: 449c7f => 4ce815 => 4d00cf => 50936d
> >
> > 50936d: SIZE_verify+168
> > 4d00cf: (undetermined)
> > 4ce815: x86_64_init+3205
> > 449c7f: main_loop+152
> >
> > I can dig deeper but your help would be very much appreciated.
> >
> > Mike
>
> The venerable "been-there-since-the-beginning-of-x86_64" x8664_pda
> data structure no longer exists. It was a per-cpu array of a fundamental
> data structure that things like "current", the per-cpu magic number, the
> cpu number, the current kernel stack pointer, the per-cpu IRQ stack pointer,
> etc. all came from:
>
> /* Per processor datastructure. %gs points to it while the kernel runs */
> struct x8664_pda {
> struct task_struct *pcurrent; /* Current process */
> unsigned long data_offset; /* Per cpu data offset from linker address */
> unsigned long kernelstack; /* top of kernel stack for current */
> unsigned long oldrsp; /* user rsp for system call */
> #if DEBUG_STKSZ > EXCEPTION_STKSZ
> unsigned long debugstack; /* #DB/#BP stack. */
> #endif
> int irqcount; /* Irq nesting counter. Starts with -1 */
> int cpunumber; /* Logical CPU number */
> char *irqstackptr; /* top of irqstack */
> int nodenumber; /* number of current node */
> unsigned int __softirq_pending;
> unsigned int __nmi_count; /* number of NMI on this CPUs */
> int mmu_state;
> struct mm_struct *active_mm;
> unsigned apic_timer_irqs;
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> There have been upstream rumblings about replacing it with a more efficient
> per-cpu implementation for some time now, but I haven't studied how the new
> scheme works yet. It will be a major re-work for the crash utility, so you're
> pretty much out of luck for now. (Try "gdb vmlinux vmcore" for basic info)
Ah OK. I was just looking to get a stack trace. Unfortunately gdb
isn't playing nice either:
(gdb) bt
#0 kstat_irqs_cpu (irq=<value optimized out>, cpu=2) at kernel/irq/handle.c:555
Cannot access memory at address 0xffff88007e5e7d50
> In the meantime, can you give me a copy of your vmcore? (offline -- note that
> I'm forwarding this to the crash-utility mailing list). And I'll start working
> on it.
OK, will do.
Mike
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list