[Crash-utility] [PATCH] s390: Fix stack trace code for program checks

[Michael Holzheu]

Hello Dave,

On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:13 -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
> > > I'm not particularly enamored with the use of the zero-filled
> > > "double-number" frame fields -- mainly because it's different
> > > than all of the other architectures (even the s390).
> > > The other arches just move the asterisk one field to the left if the
> > > frame
> > > number goes into double figures, keeping the remaining fields
> > > lined up:
> > >
> > >         fprintf(fp, "%s#%d [ ...
> > >              level < 10 ? " " : "",
> > >
> > > While I try not to interfere with architecture maintainers,
> > > is there a particular reason you want to do it that way?
> > 
> > No problem. This is also fine with me. Should I change this or do you
> > want to do that?
> > 
> > Michael
> 
> I just changed print_frame() to do it.  And, sorry -- I didn't mean
> to twist your arm...   ;-)

It is good to keep the architectures as similar as possible. That's part
of your job :-)

> 
> Queued for 5.1.15.

Thanks!

Michael