[Crash-utility] "zero-size memory allocation!" is back for Linux 3.1
Dave Anderson
anderson at redhat.com
Wed Jan 18 14:35:14 UTC 2012
----- Original Message -----
> In include/linux/slab_def.h circa linux 3.0, this def for field
> nodelists:
>
> struct kmem_cache {
> /* 1) per-cpu data, touched during every alloc/free */
> struct array_cache *array[NR_CPUS];
>
> ...
>
> struct kmem_list3 *nodelists[MAX_NUMNODES];
> /*
> * Do not add fields after nodelists[]
> */
> };
>
> Became this in 3.1:
>
> struct kmem_cache {
> ...
>
> /* 6) per-cpu/per-node data, touched during every alloc/free */
> /*
> * We put array[] at the end of kmem_cache, because we want to size
> * this array to nr_cpu_ids slots instead of NR_CPUS
> * (see kmem_cache_init())
> * We still use [NR_CPUS] and not [1] or [0] because
> cache_cache
> * is statically defined, so we reserve the max number of cpus.
> */
> struct kmem_list3 **nodelists;
> struct array_cache *array[NR_CPUS];
> /*
> * Do not add fields after array[]
> */
> };
>
>
> Which causes this in crash/memory.c:vm_init()
>
> ARRAY_LENGTH_INIT(vt->kmem_cache_len_nodes, NULL,
> "kmem_cache.nodelists", NULL, 0);
>
> to set vt->kmem_cache_len_nodes to 0, and leads to the initialization
> failure when max_cpudata_limit calls getbuf with a size of 0.
>
> Got a fix in the works yet?
>
> Thanks,
> Bob Montgomery
No, afraid not. Fedora uses slub instead of slab, so I haven't
noticed it. I wonder why kmem_cache_downsize() doesn't recalculate
vt->kmem_cache_len_nodes based upon "nr_node_ids"?:
if (buffer_size < SIZE(kmem_cache_s)) {
if (kernel_symbol_exists("nr_node_ids")) {
get_symbol_data("nr_node_ids", sizeof(int),
&nr_node_ids);
vt->kmem_cache_len_nodes = nr_node_ids;
} else
vt->kmem_cache_len_nodes = 1;
Dave
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list