[Crash-utility] [PATCH]: symbol filtering

[Per Fransson]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Dave Anderson <anderson at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> For x86, crash avoids storing any '__crc_*' symbols. It should do the
>> >> same for ARM, right? Credit goes to Rabin Vincent for this patch,
>> >> unless you don't like it, in which case you can blame me.
>> >
>> > I suppose.  It was more of a clutter-reducer than anything else in
>> > the case of x86.  But I do note that the __crc_ symbols come after
>> > "_end" in one of the sample ARM dumpfiles I've got on hand.
>> >
>>
>> Clutter reduction is the reason for both of these patches as well and
>> even if the __crc_'s are ignored we'll still get _end+<offset>
>> printouts for everything in the range [_end, 0xff0a81a8]. Of course, a
>> patch for PRRR shouldn't break 'mod -s'. Here's an alternative patch.
>>
>> /Per
>
> OK good -- I'll queue both the __crc_ and PRRR/NMRR patches for crash-6.1.3,
> pending any (unlikely) disapprovals/NAKs from Mika or Jan.
>

Naturally. Thanks.

/Per

> Thanks,
>   Dave
>
>>
>> > Anyway, I don't have a problem with the patch.  Mika?
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > --
>> > Crash-utility mailing list
>> > Crash-utility at redhat.com
>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
>>
>> --
>> Crash-utility mailing list
>> Crash-utility at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
>
> --
> Crash-utility mailing list
> Crash-utility at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility