[Crash-utility] [PATCH] Fix machdep->HZ calculation for kernel versions > 2.6.0

lijiang lijiang at redhat.com
Fri Apr 23 06:41:16 UTC 2021


在 2021年04月22日 22:26, lijiang 写道:
> 在 2021年04月22日 17:33, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) 写道:
>> -----Original Message-----
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> 在 2021年01月12日 16:24, HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) 写道:
>>>>> Hi Bhupesh,
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> We have hard-coded the HZ value for some ARCHs to either 1000 or 100
>>>>>> (mainly for kernel versions > 2.6.0), which causes 'help -m' to show
>>>>>> an incorrect hz value for various architectures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch.  but seems crash uses (cfq_slice_async * 25) for machdep->hz
>>>>> if it exists (please see task_init()), RHEL7 has it, but RHEL8 does not.
>>>>> What do you see on RHEL8 for x86_64 with your patch?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The symbol 'cfq_slice_async' has been removed from upstream kernel:
>>>> f382fb0bcef4 ("block: remove legacy IO schedulers")
>>>>
>>>> And RHEL8 also removed it.
>>>>
>>>>> We should search for an alternate way like the current one first.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Currently, there are several ways to get the value of HZ as below:
>>>>
>>>> [1] calculate hz via the symbol 'cfq_slice_async'
>>>>     But this symbol has been removed from upstream kernel
>>>
>>> According to [0] below, the 'cfq_slice_async' cannot be used for the HZ
>>> calculation on 4.8 and later kernels.  I've not found a perfect alternate,
>>> but how about using 'bfq_timeout' for 4.12 and later including RHEL8?
>>
>> e.g. like this:
>>
>> --- a/task.c
>> +++ b/task.c
>> @@ -417,7 +417,16 @@ task_init(void)
>>  
>>  	STRUCT_SIZE_INIT(cputime_t, "cputime_t");
>>  
>> -	if (symbol_exists("cfq_slice_async")) {
>> +	if (symbol_exists("bfq_timeout")) {
>> +		uint bfq_timeout;
>> +		get_symbol_data("bfq_timeout", sizeof(int), &bfq_timeout);
>> +		if (bfq_timeout) {
>> +			machdep->hz = bfq_timeout * 8;
>> +			if (CRASHDEBUG(2))
>> +				fprintf(fp, "bfq_timeout exists: setting hz to %d\n",
>> +					machdep->hz);
>> +		}
>> +	} else if (symbol_exists("cfq_slice_async")) {
>>  		uint cfq_slice_async;
>>  
>>  		get_symbol_data("cfq_slice_async", sizeof(int),
>>
>>
>> Lianbo, could you try this on ppc64le if it looks good?
>>
> Sure. On my ppc64le machine, crash got 96hz after applying the above patch. The reason
> is that kernel calculates the value of bfq_timeout as below:
> 
> bfq_timeout = HZ / 8;
> 
> The actual value of HZ is 100, so bfq_timeout = 100 / 8 = 12, but in crash, we calculate
> the value of HZ:
> 
> HZ = bfq_timeout * 8 = 12 * 8 = 96
> 
> It seems that this is not the result what we expected.
> 
>> btw, I thought 'read_expire' was better than the 'bfq_timeout' because it
>> was introduced at 2.6.16 and has been unchanged, but most of kernels(vmlinux)
> 
> Sounds good. But unfortunately, the 'read_expire' is a static variable in kernel, we
> can not get it directly by the symbol search. Maybe we should try to find a static
> variable(kernel) in another ways. 
> 
> If it is possible, I would tend to use the 'write_expire' to calculate the value of HZ
> in crash as below, that can avoid the above issues and get a correct result.
> 
> HZ = write_expire / 5;
> 
> /*
>  * source: block/mq-deadline.c
>  */
> static const int write_expire = 5 * HZ
> 
> For example:
> +       if (symbol_exists("write_expire")) { ----> Here, it failed, maybe we can try to find the symbol in another way.
> +               uint write_expire;
> +               get_symbol_data("write_expire", sizeof(int), &write_expire);
> +               if (write_expire) {
> +                       machdep->hz = write_expire / 5;
> +                       if (CRASHDEBUG(2))
> +                               fprintf(fp, "write_expire exists: setting hz to %d\n",
> +                                       machdep->hz);
> +               }
> +       }  else
> 
>> that I have do not have a symbol for it.  (some optimization?)
>>
> I can get the values of 'read_expire' and 'write_expire' in the latest rhel8 or later.
> 
> crash> p read_expire
> $1 = 50
> crash> p write_expire
> $2 = 500
> 
> Thanks.
> Linabo
> 

How do you think about the following changes? It works for me.

/*
 * source: net/ipv4/inetpeer.c
 * int inet_peer_minttl __read_mostly = 120 * HZ;  /* TTL under high load: 120 sec */
 */

diff --git a/task.c b/task.c
index 423cd45..4af3ef3 100644
--- a/task.c
+++ b/task.c
@@ -417,7 +417,17 @@ task_init(void)
 
        STRUCT_SIZE_INIT(cputime_t, "cputime_t");
 
-       if (symbol_exists("cfq_slice_async")) {
+       if (symbol_exists("inet_peer_minttl")) {
+               uint inet_peer_minttl;
+               get_symbol_data("inet_peer_minttl", sizeof(int), &inet_peer_minttl);
+               if (inet_peer_minttl) {
+                       machdep->hz = inet_peer_minttl / 120;
+                       if (CRASHDEBUG(2))
+                               fprintf(fp, "inet_peer_minttl exists: setting hz to %d\n",
+                                       machdep->hz);
+               }
+       }  else if (symbol_exists("cfq_slice_async")) {
                uint cfq_slice_async;

Thanks.
Lianbo

>> static const int read_expire = HZ / 2;  /* max time before a read is submitted. */
>>
>>      RELEASE: 4.18.0-80.el8.x86_64
>>
>> crash> p read_expire
>> No symbol "read_expire" in current context.
>> p: gdb request failed: p read_expire
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kazu
>>
>>>
>>> const int bfq_timeout = HZ / 8;
>>>
>>>      RELEASE: 4.18.0-80.el8.x86_64
>>>
>>> crash> p bfq_timeout
>>> bfq_timeout = $1 = 125
>>>
>>> This value has not been changed since its introduction (aee69d78dec0).
>>> Recent kernels configured with CONFIG_IOSCHED_BFQ=y can be covered with this?
>>>
>>> [0] https://listman.redhat.com/archives/crash-utility/2021-April/msg00026.html
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kazu
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [2] hardcode hz with the value 1000 (if kernel version > 2.6.0)
>>>>
>>>> [3] get the hz value from vmcore, but that relies on kernel config
>>>>     such as CONFIG_IKCONFIG, etc.
>>>>
>>>> [4] Use sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK) on some arches, not all arches.
>>>>     See the micro definition of HZ in the defs.h
>>>>
>>>> There seems to be no perfect solution. Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Lianbo
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Kazu
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tested this on ppc64le and x86_64 and the hz value reported is 1000,
>>>>>> whereas the kernel CONFIG_HZ_100 is set to Y. See some logs below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crash> help -m
>>>>>>               flags: 124000f5
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> (KSYMS_START|MACHDEP_BT_TEXT|VM_4_LEVEL|VMEMMAP|VMEMMAP_AWARE|PHYS_ENTRY_L4|SWAP_ENTRY_L4|RADIX_MMU|OP
>>>>>> AL_FW)
>>>>>>              kvbase: c000000000000000
>>>>>>   identity_map_base: c000000000000000
>>>>>>            pagesize: 65536
>>>>>>           pageshift: 16
>>>>>>            pagemask: ffffffffffff0000
>>>>>>          pageoffset: ffff
>>>>>>           stacksize: 16384
>>>>>>                  hz: 1000
>>>>>>                 mhz: 2800
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [host at rhel7]$ grep CONFIG_HZ_100= redhat/configs/kernel-3.10.0-ppc64le.config
>>>>>> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix the same by using the sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK) value instead of the
>>>>>> hardcoded HZ values depending on kernel versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Crash-utility mailing list
>>> Crash-utility at redhat.com
>>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
>>




More information about the Crash-utility mailing list