[Crash-utility] [PATCHv7 1/4] crash-utility/arm64: introduce a dedicated field to record the mem layout changes
lijiang
lijiang at redhat.com
Mon Jun 7 06:27:42 UTC 2021
Hi, Pingfan
Thank you for the update.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 10:39 AM Pingfan Liu <piliu at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> At present, we have the following important changes for arm64 memory
> layout:
>
> -1. redesigned ARM64 kernel virtual memory layout and associated KASLR
> support that was introduced in Linux 4.6. And NEW_VMEMMAP is used to
> flag it.
> -2. memory layout flipped just right before introducing 52-bits kernel.
> -3. introducing of vabits_actual and phyvirt_offset in kernel
> -4. removing phyvirt_offset.
>
> These changes have effects on PTOV()/VTOP() formula. So introducing a
> dedicate field mmlayout_flags to record it.
>
> Among above, 2 and 3 are introduced closely, and are not distinguished
> in current implement. And this patch also keep this practice and use
> vabits_actual as a hint to flag mem flipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu at redhat.com>
> Cc: HAGIO KAZUHITO <k-hagio-ab at nec.com>
> Cc: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang at redhat.com>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma at linaro.org>
> To: crash-utility at redhat.com
> ---
> arm64.c | 11 +++++++++++
> defs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
> index 8934961..eb88ced 100644
> --- a/arm64.c
> +++ b/arm64.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ static int arm64_is_uvaddr(ulong, struct task_context *);
> static void arm64_calc_KERNELPACMASK(void);
>
>
I tested this patchset with the old vmcore and the latest vmcore, and
it passed. But I still have
some questions:
> +/* arm64 kernel layout experiences changes, using these flags to distinguish them */
> +#define MMLAYOUT_FLAGS_FLIP 0x1
[1] For this micro, is it possible to check the "vabits_actual" and
"TCR_EL1_T1SZ" in order to
achieve a similar purpose?
if (kernel_symbol_exists("vabits_actual") || ...
read_vmcoreinfo("NUMBER(TCR_EL1_T1SZ)"))
> +#define MMLAYOUT_FLAGS_HAS_PHYSVIRT_OFFSET 0x2
[2] For this one, can it be replaced with the following ways instead
of adding a new micro definition?
if (kernel_symbol_exists("physvirt_offset"))
Thanks.
Lianbo
> +
> /*
> * Do all necessary machine-specific setup here. This is called several times
> * during initialization.
> @@ -994,6 +998,7 @@ arm64_calc_physvirt_offset(void)
> if (READMEM(pc->mfd, &physvirt_offset, sizeof(physvirt_offset),
> sp->value, sp->value -
> machdep->machspec->kimage_voffset) > 0) {
> + machdep->machspec->mmlayout_flags |= MMLAYOUT_FLAGS_HAS_PHYSVIRT_OFFSET;
> ms->physvirt_offset = physvirt_offset;
> }
> }
> @@ -3923,6 +3928,7 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
> if (kernel_symbol_exists("vabits_actual")) {
> if (pc->flags & PROC_KCORE) {
> vabits_actual = symbol_value_from_proc_kallsyms("vabits_actual");
> + machdep->machspec->mmlayout_flags |= MMLAYOUT_FLAGS_FLIP;
> if ((vabits_actual != BADVAL) && (READMEM(pc->mfd, &value, sizeof(ulong),
> vabits_actual, KCORE_USE_VADDR) > 0)) {
> if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
> @@ -3953,6 +3959,11 @@ arm64_calc_VA_BITS(void)
> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL = value;
> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS = value;
> machdep->machspec->VA_START = _VA_START(machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
> + /*
> + * The mm flip commit is introduced before 52-bits VA, which is before the
> + * commit to export NUMBER(TCR_EL1_T1SZ)
> + */
> + machdep->machspec->mmlayout_flags |= MMLAYOUT_FLAGS_FLIP;
> } else if (machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL) {
> machdep->machspec->VA_BITS = machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL;
> machdep->machspec->VA_START = _VA_START(machdep->machspec->VA_BITS_ACTUAL);
> diff --git a/defs.h b/defs.h
> index 396d61a..22b3cbd 100644
> --- a/defs.h
> +++ b/defs.h
> @@ -3290,6 +3290,7 @@ struct arm64_pt_regs {
> struct machine_specific {
> ulong flags;
> ulong userspace_top;
> + ulong mmlayout_flags;
> ulong page_offset;
> ulong vmalloc_start_addr;
> ulong vmalloc_end;
> --
> 2.29.2
>
More information about the Crash-utility
mailing list