[dm-devel] 2.6.3-udm4

Mike Christie mikenc at us.ibm.com
Fri Feb 27 17:44:01 UTC 2004


Kevin Corry wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2004 3:41 pm, Kevin Corry wrote:
> 
>>On Friday 27 February 2004 12:58 pm, Mike Christie wrote:
>>
>>>Joe Thornber wrote:
>>>
>>>>http://people.sistina.com/~thornber/dm/patches/2.6-unstable/2.6.3/2.6.3
>>>>-u dm4.tar.bz2
>>>>
>>>>Note the mpath contructor args have changed again (no priority).
>>>
>>>I have been trying the latest dm-mpath patches, but when I fail a path
>>>(pull a cord or disable a port) dm-mpath oops on queue_work for the
>>>trigger_event work (if I do a addr2line it says it is in
>>>__atomic_dec_and_test). The strange thing is if I just comment the
>>>queue_work line out, in fail_path() it will hit a BUG() in the spin lock
>>>code that tests the lock magic. I will post the oops when I get the
>>>output from serial line, but has anyone had success with failover in the
>>>current dm-mpath? This actually has occured for this release and udm3 w/
>>>Joe's bio record patches.
>>
>>Yep, I just hit that as well. Looks to me like the path->pg->m pointer got
>>munged. Actually...it looks like the m pointer never got initialized in the
>>priority group. Yep....patch 11 from -udm4 removed
>>__insert_priority_group(), which is where that pointer got initialized.
>>Here's one possible patch which should fix it.
> 
> 
> Failover is working fine on my system now with this patch.
> 

Thanks for the patch. It fixes dm-mpath for me.

You are using ram backed storage though, right? Failover still does not 
work for me, but I have been tracking it down to SCSI or qla2xxx's fault.

Thanks,

Mike




More information about the dm-devel mailing list