[dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs representation of stacked devices (dm) (rev.2)

[Jun'ichi Nomura]

Hi,

Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
 > This patch needs splitting up so that independent changes can be
 > considered separately.
 >
 > c.f. The proposal from Mike Anderson (repeated below) which I prefer
 > because it makes it clear that a table always belongs to exactly one md.

I like his proposed patch.
The interface is useful for my purpose too and moving table
creation inside _hash_lock means I don't need dm_get() neither.

Is it going to be pushed to upstream?
I'll remake my patch based on it.

-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc.