[dm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/4] dm-log: support multi-log devices
malahal at us.ibm.com
malahal at us.ibm.com
Thu Jan 8 19:00:39 UTC 2009
Jonathan Brassow [jbrassow at redhat.com] wrote:
> My general feeling is that it is better to do in userspace, but this is
> only because I think there is so much improvement to be done in the mirror
> DSO - transient fault handling being one of those areas. If you all can
> get your benefits of multi-log, while I get my benefits of an improved DSO,
> then I am very happy.
>
> That being said, there may also be merit in the kernel approach. I haven't
> tried to think through all the nasty cases where log devices and mirror
> devices overlap. For example, I want a 3-way mirror with a 2-way redundant
> mirror log and I only have 3 physical disks. If I get a failure on a
> device that contains both log and leg, how are the failures going to be
> handled? It could get difficult with the layering...
The log mirror would be out-of-sync but should/would still continue to
operate. The leg mirror would be out-of-sync as well. Depending on how
it is configured, the log mirror may go to linear/single device mode.
Thank you Jonathan for your comments.
--Malahal.
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list