[dm-devel] [PATCH 08/11] block: rename barrier/ordered to flush
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Tue Aug 17 17:08:57 UTC 2010
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeap, agreed. I couldn't really understand why the the sequence
> needed to be atomic for ide in the first place so just left it alone.
> Do you understand why it tried to be atomic?
I think initial drafs of the barrier specification talked about atomic
sequences. Except for that I can't think of any reason.
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list