[dm-devel] [linux-lvm] New LVM2 release 2.02.89: Thinly-provisioned logical volumes

[Busby.Cheung]

Hi Zdenek,

          I checked my kernel config, both of the options I set  'y', and then built kernel without CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_SPACE_MAPS and CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING as you said, can solve the problem I met. Thanks!

Best regards,

Busby


 
 > -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zkabelac at redhat.com>
> 发送时间: 2012年2月2日 星期四
> 收件人: "device-mapper development" <dm-devel at redhat.com>
> 抄送: "Busby.Cheung" <chaimvy at 163.com>, "Alasdair G Kergon" <agk at redhat.com>, "LVM general discussion and development" <linux-lvm at redhat.com>
> 主题: Re: [dm-devel] [linux-lvm] New LVM2 release 2.02.89: Thinly-provisioned logical volumes
> 
> Dne 2.2.2012 02:36, Busby.Cheung napsal(a):
> > Hi Alasdair,
> >
> >               The kernel mesg log "failed to resize data device" while use dmsetup CMDs to create pool will be ok.
> >
> > use LVM2 cmd mesgs:
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > [root at host2 ~]# pvs
> >    Ignoring too small pv_min_size 512KB, using default 2048KB.
> >    PV         VG         Fmt  Attr PSize   PFree
> >    /dev/sda2  VolGroup00 lvm2 a--  931.41G      0
> >    /dev/sdg   vg_pool    lvm2 a--  931.51G 931.51G
> >    /dev/sdl   vg_pool    lvm2 a--  931.51G 931.51G
> > [root at host2 ~]# vgs
> >    Ignoring too small pv_min_size 512KB, using default 2048KB.
> >    VG         #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize   VFree
> >    VolGroup00   1   2   0 wz--n- 931.41G      0
> >    vg_pool      2   0   0 wz--n-   1.82T   1.82T
> > [root at host2 ~]# lvcreate -L65G -T vg_pool/pool
> >    Ignoring too small pv_min_size 512KB, using default 2048KB.
> >    Rounding up size to full physical extent 4.00 MB
> >    device-mapper: resume ioctl on  failed: Cannot allocate memory
> >    Unable to resume vg_pool-pool-tpool (253:12)
> >    Aborting. Failed to activate thin pool.
> > [root at host2 ~]# dmesg
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Loading debug space map from disk.  This may take some time
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Load complete
> > device-mapper: thin: failed to resize data device
> > [root at host2 ~]# cat /var/log/messages
> > Feb  2 09:14:45 host2 kernel: device-mapper: space map checker: Loading debug space map from disk.  This may take some time
> > Feb  2 09:14:45 host2 kernel: device-mapper: space map checker: Load complete
> > Feb  2 09:14:45 host2 kernel: device-mapper: thin: failed to resize data device
> >
> >   --------------------------
> > use dmsetup cmd:
> >
> > [root at host2 ~]# lvcreate -n metadata_lv -L40M  vg_pool
> >    Ignoring too small pv_min_size 512KB, using default 2048KB.
> >    Logical volume "metadata_lv" created
> > [root at host2 ~]# lvcreate -n data_lv -L300G vg_pool
> >    Ignoring too small pv_min_size 512KB, using default 2048KB.
> >    Logical volume "data_lv" created
> > [root at host2 ~]# dmsetup create pool --table "0 209715200 thin-pool /dev/vg_pool/metadata_lv /dev/vg_pool/data_lv  1024  20000"
> > [root at host2 ~]# dmsetup status
> > vg_pool-metadata_lv: 0 81920 linear
> > VolGroup00-LogVol01: 0 24510464 linear
> > vg_pool-pool-tpool: 0 136314880 thin-pool 0 76/1024 0/0 -
> > vg_pool-pool_tdata: 0 136314880 linear
> > VolGroup00-LogVol00: 0 1928790016 linear
> > vg_pool-pool_tmeta: 0 8192 linear
> > pool: 0 209715200 thin-pool 0 21/10240 0/204800 -
> > vg_pool-data_lv: 0 629145600 linear
> >
> > [root at host2 ~]# dmesg
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Loading debug space map from disk.  This may take some time
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Load complete
> > device-mapper: thin: failed to resize data device
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Loading debug space map from disk.  This may take some time
> > device-mapper: space map checker: Load complete
> > device-mapper: space map checker: free block counts differ, checker 1020, sm-disk:948
> > device-mapper: space map checker: free block counts differ, checker 10236, sm-disk:10219
> >
> 
> Have you tried to build kernel without CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_SPACE_MAPS and 
> CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING ?
> 
> These two options are there only for debugging - and have major impact on 
> performance (and possibly on memory resource as well).
> 
> To check consistency of metadata there are now user-space tools available.
> 
> Zdenek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/attachments/20120203/8a0f804f/attachment.htm>