[dm-devel] [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] a few storage topics
Andreas Dilger
aedilger at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 17:01:03 UTC 2012
Cheers, Andreas
On 2012-01-24, at 9:56, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:15:04AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/13/326
>>
>> This patch is another example, although for a slight different reason.
>> I really have no idea yet what the right answer is in a generic sense,
>> but you don't need a 512K request to see higher latencies from merging.
>
> That assumes the 512k requests is created by merging. We have enough
> workloads that create large I/O from the get go, and not splitting them
> and eventually merging them again would be a big win. E.g. I'm
> currently looking at a distributed block device which uses internal 4MB
> chunks, and increasing the maximum request size to that dramatically
> increases the read performance.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list