[dm-devel] [RFC] writeboost: rename "migration" to "writeback"

Akira Hayakawa ruby.wktk at gmail.com
Fri Jul 18 01:00:58 UTC 2014


Hi, Satoru,

> How about re-renaming "migration" to more straightforward "writeback"?
> If you agree with this idea, I'll write a patch to fix it for kernel and
> device-mapper-test-suite.
I really appreciate that you will do this work.
Please run dmts after you finish renaming.

- Akira

On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:42:48 +0900
Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Akira, Joe, and all.
> 
> Recently I've used dm-writeboost a bit. I have an opinion about the
> naming of migration. Writeboost call writeback from cache device to backing
> device "migration" as Akira said in the following his document.
> 
> https://github.com/akiradeveloper/dm-writeboost/blob/develop/doc/writeboost.txt
> ===
> ...
> (2) Migrate Daemon
> This daemon writes back the dirty data on the cache device to the backing
> device. Writeboost calls writeback "Migration".
> ...
> ===
> 
> However, I consier "writeback" is far straightforward word than "migration"
> here for most people. Since such renaming makes the usability (migration is
> visible to user) and code readability, it should be avoided without special
> reason.
> 
> How about re-renaming "migration" to more straightforward "writeback"?
> If you agree with this idea, I'll write a patch to fix it for kernel and
> device-mapper-test-suite.
> 
> Thanks,
> Satoru
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel




More information about the dm-devel mailing list