[dm-devel] dm_mirror/dm_raid1 limitations ?.
suresh.babu.kandukuru at oracle.com
suresh.babu.kandukuru at oracle.com
Mon Jan 26 15:34:11 UTC 2015
Heinzm,thanks for the quick reply.. We are using dmestup create mirror ..as we want to do that on physical San lun (block devices) ... Not the one ( lv create ) you mentioned below.. Is there any advantage going with logical volume approach lvcreate -type
/Suresh
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 26, 2015, at 7:46 PM, Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 01/26/2015 02:51 PM, Suresh Babu Kandukuru wrote:
>> Use case is : Two luns are mapped from storage array to linux host which are in same SAN fabric . we want to create a mirror on the linux host with these two luns and let host use that mirror lun . basic tests suggest that dm_mirror working fine . when we have any intermittent path issues with between host and san array , host i/o just freeze , never returns back even after the path is online.
>
> Hard to tell what's happening without any kernel log.
>
>>
>> Is dm_mirror viable solution here ?. Can you point me any link which gives the limitations of dm_mirror ? . another alternate solutions you propose here ?. Thanks in advance .
>
> We've switched the default away from "mirror" to "raid1" in order to take advantage of th MD runtime.
> Have you tested "lvcreate --type raid1 ..." yet?
> Please do.
>
> Regards,
> Heinz
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> /Suresh
>>
>>
>> --
>> dm-devel mailing list
>> dm-devel at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>
> <Untitled.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/attachments/20150126/b25f4bb2/attachment.htm>
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list