[dm-devel] [Lsf] Notes from the four separate IO track sessions at LSF/MM

Laurence Oberman loberman at redhat.com
Sat Apr 30 00:47:03 UTC 2016


Hello Bart

Around 300s before the paths were declared hard failed and the devices offlined.
This is when I/O restarts.
The remaining paths on the second Qlogic port (that are not jammed) will not be used until the error handler activity completes.

Until we get these for example, and device-mapper starts declaring paths down we are blocked.
Apr 29 17:20:51 localhost kernel: sd 1:0:1:0: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery
Apr 29 17:20:51 localhost kernel: sd 1:0:1:13: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery

Laurence Oberman
Principal Software Maintenance Engineer
Red Hat Global Support Services

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche at sandisk.com>
To: "Laurence Oberman" <loberman at redhat.com>
Cc: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley at HansenPartnership.com>, "linux-scsi" <linux-scsi at vger.kernel.org>, "Mike Snitzer" <snitzer at redhat.com>, linux-block at vger.kernel.org, "device-mapper development" <dm-devel at redhat.com>, lsf at lists.linux-foundation.org
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 8:36:22 PM
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [Lsf] Notes from the four separate IO track sessions at LSF/MM

On 04/29/2016 02:47 PM, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> Recovery with 21 LUNS is 300s that have in-flights to abort.
> [ ... ]
> eh_deadline is set to 10 on the 2 qlogic ports, eh_timeout is set
 > to 10 for all devices. In multipath fast_io_fail_tmo=5
>
> I jam one of the target array ports and discard the commands
 > effectively black-holing the commands and leave it that way until
 > we recover and I watch the I/O. The recovery takes around 300s even
 > with all the tuning and this effectively lands up in Oracle cluster
 > evictions.

Hello Laurence,

This discussion started as a discussion about the time needed to fail 
over from one path to another. How long did it take in your test before 
I/O failed over from the jammed port to another port?

Thanks,

Bart.




More information about the dm-devel mailing list