[dm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] multipath-tools: replace GROUP_BY_SERIAL with MULTIBUS for IBM 3542 and 2105

Christophe Varoqui christophe.varoqui at opensvc.com
Mon Oct 3 12:06:51 UTC 2016


Thanks.
Patch pushed.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de> wrote:

> On 10/03/2016 01:02 PM, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> > Hi Xose,
> >
> > Group by serial sure can make sense for hardware not capable of multibus.
> >
> > Can you or Hannes (listed as maintainer for IBM) confirm the concerned
> > IBM arrays are multibus capable ?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Christophe Varoqui
> > OpenSVC
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
> > <xose.vazquez at gmail.com <mailto:xose.vazquez at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     It doesn't make any sense to have, by default, GROUP_BY_SERIAL in
> >     real hardware.
> >
> >     Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de <mailto:hare at suse.de>>
> >     Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui at opensvc.com
> >     <mailto:christophe.varoqui at opensvc.com>>
> >     Cc: device-mapper development <dm-devel at redhat.com
> >     <mailto:dm-devel at redhat.com>>
> >     Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:xose.vazquez at gmail.com>>
> >     ---
> >      libmultipath/hwtable.c | 4 ++--
> >      1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >     diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c
> >     index aa3ea9b..72b5e1d 100644
> >     --- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c
> >     +++ b/libmultipath/hwtable.c
> >     @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = {
> >                     /* DS4200 / FAStT200 */
> >                     .vendor        = "IBM",
> >                     .product       = "^3542",
> >     -               .pgpolicy      = GROUP_BY_SERIAL,
> >     +               .pgpolicy      = MULTIBUS,
> >                     .pgfailback    = FAILBACK_UNDEF,
> >             },
> This is the IBM FAStT 200, which is IIRC an RDAC machine. So multibus
> will be wrong here, and it should be using the RDAC entry instead.
>
> >             {
> >     @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = {
> >                     .vendor        = "IBM",
> >                     .product       = "^2105",
> >                     .no_path_retry = NO_PATH_RETRY_QUEUE,
> >     -               .pgpolicy      = GROUP_BY_SERIAL,
> >     +               .pgpolicy      = MULTIBUS,
> >                     .pgfailback    = FAILBACK_UNDEF,
> >             },
> >             {
> That's the old IBM ESS 800; this is a fully symmetric active-active
> array. So yes, multibus is correct here.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
> --
> Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
> hare at suse.de                          +49 911 74053 688
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/attachments/20161003/d4018d9a/attachment.htm>


More information about the dm-devel mailing list