[dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-bufio: adjust the reserved buffer for dm-verify-target.
jin.xiao at intel.com
Wed Aug 8 05:51:32 UTC 2018
On 2018年08月08日 13:25, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:07:03PM +0800, xiao jin wrote:
>> We hit the BUG() report at include/linux/scatterlist.h:144!
>> The callback is as bellow:
>> => verity_work
>> => verity_hash_for_block
>> => verity_verify_level
>> => verity_hash
>> => verity_hash_update
>> => sg_init_one
>> => sg_set_buf
>> More debug shows the root cause. When creating dufio client it
>> uses the __vmalloc() to allocate the buffer data for the reserved
>> dm_buffer. The buffer that allocated by the __vmalloc() is invalid
>> according to the __virt_addr_valid().
>> Mostly the reserved dm_buffer is not touched. But occasionally
>> it might fail to allocate the dm_buffer data when we try to
>> allocate in the __alloc_buffer_wait_no_callback(). Then it has
>> to take the reserved dm_buffer for usage. Finally it reports the
>> BUG() as virt_addr_valid() detects the buffer data address is invalid.
>> The patch is to adjust the reserved buffer for dm-verity-target. We
>> allocated two dm_buffers into the reserved buffers list when creating
>> the buffer interface. The first dm_buffer in the reserved buffer list
>> is allocated by the __vmalloc(), it's not used after that. The second
>> dm_buffer in the reserved buffer list is allocated by the
>> __get_free_pages() which can be consumed after that.
>> Signed-off-by: xiao jin <jin.xiao at intel.com>
>> drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> stable kernel tree. Please read:
> for how to do this properly.
Thanks, I will resend to review without the stable mail list.
More information about the dm-devel