[dm-devel] multipath-tools: release uxsocket and resource when cancel thread
Martin Wilck
mwilck at suse.com
Sat Jan 13 19:50:24 UTC 2018
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 09:35 +0000, Wuchongyun wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Issue description:
> when multipathd initilaze and call uxsock_listen to create unix
> domain socket, but return -1 and the errno is 98
> and then the uxsock_listen return null. After multipathd startup we
> can't receive any multipathd commands to
> finish the new multipath creation anymore!
>
> We found that uxlsnr thread's cleanup function not close the sockets
> and also not release the clients when
> cancel thread, the domain socket will be release by the system. In
> any special environment like themachine's
> load is very heavy, the system may not close the old domain socket
> when we try to create and bind the domain
> socket may return 98 (Address already in use).
>
> And also we make some experiments:
> In uxsock_cleanup if we close the ux_sock first and then immdediately
> call ux_socket_listen to create new ux_sock
> and initialization will be OK; If we don't close the ux_sock and call
> ux_socket_listen will return -1 and errno = 98.
>
> So we believe that close uxsocket and release clients when cancel
> thread might making new starting multipathd
> thread can create uxsocket successfully, and might receiving
> multipathd commands properly.
> And also this path can fix clients' memory leak.
I think this is correct. But I have some remarks, see below.
>
> Thanks,
> Chongyun
>
> Signed-off-by: wu chongyun <wu.chongyun at h3c.com>
> ---
> multipathd/uxlsnr.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/multipathd/uxlsnr.c b/multipathd/uxlsnr.c
> index 98ac25a..de6950b 100644
> --- a/multipathd/uxlsnr.c
> +++ b/multipathd/uxlsnr.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,20 @@ void check_timeout(struct timespec start_time,
> char *inbuf,
>
> void uxsock_cleanup(void *arg)
> {
> + struct client *client_loop;
> + struct client *client_tmp;
> + int ux_sock = (int)arg;
> +
> + /*
> + * no need to protect clients,
> + * because all operations to clients are only from one
> thread(uxlsnr)
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(client_loop, client_tmp, &clients,
> node) {
> + dead_client(client_loop);
This takes and releases the client_lock in every loop iteration.
I'd rather take the lock, loop over all clients freeing the resources,
and relase.
> + }
> +
> + close(ux_sock);
> +
> cli_exit();
> free_polls();
> }
> @@ -162,7 +176,7 @@ void * uxsock_listen(uxsock_trigger_fn
> uxsock_trigger, void * trigger_data)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - pthread_cleanup_push(uxsock_cleanup, NULL);
> + pthread_cleanup_push(uxsock_cleanup, (void*)ux_sock);
This patch has whitespace issues.
Regards,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list