[dm-devel] [PATCH] multipathd: fix inverted signal blocking logic

[Bart Van Assche]

On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 23:15 +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 21:35 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > This change looks more complicated to me than necessary. Have you
> > considered
> > to pass an empty signal set as the fourth ppoll() argument?
> 
> An empty set would mean that no signal is blocked during ppoll().
> Therefore e.g. SIGALRM would terminate multipathd if it arrives
> during the ppoll (no handler set, and default action is "Term").

Have you considered to only block SIGALRM while ppoll() is in progress?

Thanks,

Bart.