[dm-devel] [PATCH v2] dm raid: fix parse_raid_params() variable range issue

Heinz Mauelshagen heinzm at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 17:21:28 UTC 2018


This v2 addresses Mikulas' point about the variable range and folds in
"[PATCH] dm raid: use __within_range() more in parse_raid_params()":

parse_raid_parames() compared variable "int value" with
INT_MAX to prevent overflow of mddev variables set.

Change type to "long long value".

Whilst on it, use __within_range() throughout and
add a sync min/max rate check.

Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index c1d1034ff7b7..c0e3d2aa9346 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs)
 static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 			     unsigned int num_raid_params)
 {
-	int value, raid10_format = ALGORITHM_RAID10_DEFAULT;
+	long long value, raid10_format = ALGORITHM_RAID10_DEFAULT;
 	unsigned int raid10_copies = 2;
 	unsigned int i, write_mostly = 0;
 	unsigned int region_size = 0;
@@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 	arg = dm_shift_arg(as);
 	num_raid_params--; /* Account for chunk_size argument */
 
-	if (kstrtoint(arg, 10, &value) < 0) {
+	if (kstrtoll(arg, 10, &value) < 0) {
 		rs->ti->error = "Bad numerical argument given for chunk_size";
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 		/*
 		 * Parameters with number values from here on.
 		 */
-		if (kstrtoint(arg, 10, &value) < 0) {
+		if (kstrtoll(arg, 10, &value) < 0) {
 			rs->ti->error = "Bad numerical argument given in raid params";
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 				rs->ti->error = "Only one min_recovery_rate argument pair allowed";
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
-			if (value > INT_MAX) {
+			if (!__within_range(value, 0, INT_MAX)) {
 				rs->ti->error = "min_recovery_rate out of range";
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
@@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 				rs->ti->error = "Only one max_recovery_rate argument pair allowed";
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
-			if (value > INT_MAX) {
+			if (!__within_range(value, 0, INT_MAX)) {
 				rs->ti->error = "max_recovery_rate out of range";
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
@@ -1472,6 +1472,12 @@ static int parse_raid_params(struct raid_set *rs, struct dm_arg_set *as,
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (rs->md.sync_speed_max &&
+	    rs->md.sync_speed_max < rs->md.sync_speed_min) {
+		rs->ti->error = "sync speed max smaller than min";
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (test_bit(__CTR_FLAG_SYNC, &rs->ctr_flags) &&
 	    test_bit(__CTR_FLAG_NOSYNC, &rs->ctr_flags)) {
 		rs->ti->error = "sync and nosync are mutually exclusive";
-- 
2.14.3




More information about the dm-devel mailing list