[dm-devel] [patch 0/5] device mapper percpu patches
Mike Snitzer
snitzer at redhat.com
Wed Nov 7 22:42:25 UTC 2018
On Wed, Nov 07 2018 at 5:29pm -0500,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06 2018 at 4:34pm -0500,
> Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > These are the device mapper percpu patches.
> >
> > Note that I didn't test request-based device mapper because I don't have
> > hardware for it (the patches don't convert request-base targets to percpu
> > values, but there are a few inevitable changes in dm-rq.c).
>
> Patches 1 - 3 make sense. But the use of percpu inflight counters isn't
> something I can get upstream. Any more scalable counter still needs to
> be wired up to the block stats interfaces (the one you did in patch 5 is
> only for the "inflight" fsffs file, there is also the generic diskstats
> callout to part_in_flight(), etc). Wiring up both part_in_flight() and
> part_in_flight_rw() to optionally callout to a new callback isn't going
> to fly.. especially if that callout is looping up the sum of percpu
> counters.
>
> I checked with Jens and now that in 4.21 all of the old request-based IO
> path is gone (and given that blk-mq bypasses use of ->in_flight[]): the
> only consumer of the existing ->in_flight[] is the bio-based IO path.
>
> Given that now only bio-based is consuming it, and your work was focused
> on making bio-based DM's "pending" IO accounting more scalable, it is
> best to just change block core's ->in_flight[] directly.
>
> But Jens is against switching to using percpu counters because they are
> really slow when summing the counts. And diskstats does that
> frequently. Jens said at least 2 other attempts were made and rejected
> to switch over to percpu counters.
>
> Jens' suggestion is to implement a new generic rolling per-node
> counter. Would you be open to trying that?
I've based my dm-4.21 branch on Jens' for-4.21/block branch and staged
your first 3 patches. If you're interested in exploring rolling
per-node inflight counters please base your work on this branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/log/?h=dm-4.21
("rolling per-node counters" aside, any new DM development should be
based on the dm-4.21 branch)
Mike
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list