[dm-devel] [PATCH 08/12] libmultipath(coverity): fix "enum misuse" for find_multipaths

Benjamin Marzinski bmarzins at redhat.com
Thu Jan 17 21:32:53 UTC 2019


On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:25:03PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 13:55 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 11:54:05PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>
> > > ---
> > >  libmultipath/dict.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/libmultipath/dict.c b/libmultipath/dict.c
> > > index fd29abc..eaad4f1 100644
> > > --- a/libmultipath/dict.c
> > > +++ b/libmultipath/dict.c
> > > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ def_find_multipaths_handler(struct config
> > > *conf, vector strvec)
> > >  	int i;
> > >  
> > >  	if (set_yes_no_undef(strvec, &conf->find_multipaths) == 0 &&
> > > -	    conf->find_multipaths != YNU_UNDEF)
> > > +	    conf->find_multipaths != FIND_MULTIPATHS_UNDEF)
> > >  		return 0;
> > 
> > Is there some reason that I don't understand why YNU_UNDEF is
> > problematic here, but not later in the function at the:
> > 
> >         if (conf->find_multipaths == YNU_UNDEF) {
> >                 condlog(0, "illegal value for find_multipaths: %s",
> > buff);
> >                 conf->find_multipaths = DEFAULT_FIND_MULTIPATHS;
> >         }
> > 
> > check?
> 
> Good catch. Maybe coverity would have found that in a second pass? Or I
> was just too blind... As I said, this round of work on coverity was
> disrupted by coverity's server downtime, which is still not fixed.
> 
> Anyway, this isn't wrong, only incomplete. I'd rather not resend the
> whole series because of this. When coverity is up again, I'll do
> another round of fixes.
> 

Sure. ACK.

-Ben

> Martin
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
> SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> 




More information about the dm-devel mailing list