[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [dm-devel] dm-crypt error when CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC is disabled

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:27:46PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20 2019 at  3:21pm -0400,
> Milan Broz <gmazyland gmail com> wrote:
> > On 20/09/2019 19:37, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 20 2019 at 11:44am -0400,
> > > Thibaut Sautereau <thibaut sautereau clip-os org> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I just got a dm-crypt "crypt: Error allocating crypto tfm" error when
> > >> trying to "cryptsetup open" a volume. I found out that it was only
> > >> happening when I disabled CONFIG_CRYPTO_AUTHENC.
> > >>
> > >> drivers/md/dm-crypt.c includes the crypto/authenc.h header and seems to
> > >> use some CRYPTO_AUTHENC-related stuff. Therefore, shouldn't
> > > 
> > > Yes, it looks like commit ef43aa38063a6 ("dm crypt: add cryptographic
> > > data integrity protection (authenticated encryption)") should've added
> > > 'select CRYPTO_AUTHENC' to dm-crypt's Kconfig.  I'll let Milan weigh-in
> > > but that seems like the right way forward.
> > 
> > No, I don't this so. It is like you use some algorithm that is just not compiled-in,
> > or it is disabled in the current state (because of FIPS mode od so) - it fails
> > to initialize it.
> > 
> > I think we should not force dm-crypt to depend on AEAD - most users
> > do not use authenticated encryption, it is perfectly ok to keep this compiled out.
> > 
> > I do not see any principal difference from disabling any other crypto
> > (if you disable XTS mode, it fails to open device that uses it).
> > 
> > IMO the current config dependence is ok.
> That is a good point.  I hadn't considered the kernel compiles just fine
> without CRYPTO_AUTHENC.. which it clearly does.
> SO I retract the question/thought of updating the Kconfig for dm-crypt
> in my previous mail.
> Though in hindsight: wonder whether the dm-integrity based dm-crypt
> authenticated encryption support should have been exposed as a proper
> CONFIG option within the DM_CRYPT section?  Rather than lean on the
> crypto subsystem to happily stub out the dm-crypt AEAD and AUTHENC
> related code dm-crypt could've established #ifdef boundaries for that
> code.
> I'm open to suggestions and/or confirmation that the way things are now
> is perfectly fine.  But I do see this report as something that should
> drive some improvement.

FWIW, I think you're being saved right now by the craziness in the crypto
subsystem Kconfig options: CONFIG_DM_CRYPT selects CONFIG_CBC, which selects
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEAD2 (and all the other algorithm types, for that matter).
This makes the AEAD API available.

If this wasn't the case, dm-crypt's use of crypto_alloc_aead() would be causing
a link error in some kernel configurations, since CONFIG_DM_CRYPT doesn't
actually select the AEAD API itself.

At some point I (or someone else up to the task) might try to fix the crypto
subsystem to not make every template select every algorithm type.  In that
happens, we'll need to update the users like dm-crypt to explicitly select the
algorithm types they're using, if they were being implicitly selected before.

In any case, allowing users to compile out the AEAD support in dm-crypt would
also be nice if it's not too difficult, since not everyone needs it.

- Eric

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]