[dm-devel] [PATCH 07/11] dm-zoned: replace 'target' pointer in the bio context

Hannes Reinecke hare at suse.de
Tue Apr 14 06:36:07 UTC 2020


On 4/10/20 8:52 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2020/04/09 15:45, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Replace the 'target' pointer in the bio context with the
>> device pointer as this is what's actually used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
>> index fa297348f0bb..1ee10789f04d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>>    * Zone BIO context.
>>    */
>>   struct dmz_bioctx {
>> -	struct dmz_target	*target;
>> +	struct dmz_dev		*dev;
>>   	struct dm_zone		*zone;
>>   	struct bio		*bio;
>>   	refcount_t		ref;
>> @@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ struct dmz_target {
>>    */
>>   #define DMZ_FLUSH_PERIOD	(10 * HZ)
>>   
>> +struct dmz_dev *dmz_sect_to_dev(struct dmz_target *dmz, sector_t sect)
>> +{
>> +	return &dmz->dev[0];
>> +}
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Target BIO completion.
>>    */
>> @@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ static inline void dmz_bio_endio(struct bio *bio, blk_status_t status)
>>   	if (status != BLK_STS_OK && bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK)
>>   		bio->bi_status = status;
>>   	if (bio->bi_status != BLK_STS_OK)
>> -		bioctx->target->dev->flags |= DMZ_CHECK_BDEV;
>> +		bioctx->dev->flags |= DMZ_CHECK_BDEV;
>>   
>>   	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&bioctx->ref)) {
>>   		struct dm_zone *zone = bioctx->zone;
>> @@ -118,14 +123,20 @@ static int dmz_submit_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
>>   			  struct bio *bio, sector_t chunk_block,
>>   			  unsigned int nr_blocks)
>>   {
>> -	struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx = dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
>> +	struct dmz_dev *dev = dmz_zone_to_dev(dmz->metadata, zone);
>> +	struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx =
>> +		dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
>>   	struct bio *clone;
>>   
>> +	if (dev->flags & DMZ_BDEV_DYING)
>> +		return -EIO;
>> +
>>   	clone = bio_clone_fast(bio, GFP_NOIO, &dmz->bio_set);
>>   	if (!clone)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>> -	bio_set_dev(clone, dmz->dev->bdev);
>> +	bio_set_dev(clone, dev->bdev);
>> +	bioctx->dev = dev;
>>   	clone->bi_iter.bi_sector =
>>   		dmz_start_sect(dmz->metadata, zone) + dmz_blk2sect(chunk_block);
>>   	clone->bi_iter.bi_size = dmz_blk2sect(nr_blocks) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> @@ -218,8 +229,10 @@ static int dmz_handle_read(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
>>   
>>   		if (nr_blocks) {
>>   			/* Valid blocks found: read them */
>> -			nr_blocks = min_t(unsigned int, nr_blocks, end_block - chunk_block);
>> -			ret = dmz_submit_bio(dmz, rzone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>> +			nr_blocks = min_t(unsigned int, nr_blocks,
>> +					  end_block - chunk_block);
>> +			ret = dmz_submit_bio(dmz, rzone, bio,
>> +					     chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>>   			if (ret)
>>   				return ret;
>>   			chunk_block += nr_blocks;
>> @@ -330,14 +343,16 @@ static int dmz_handle_write(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
>>   		 * and the BIO is aligned to the zone write pointer:
>>   		 * direct write the zone.
>>   		 */
>> -		return dmz_handle_direct_write(dmz, zone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>> +		return dmz_handle_direct_write(dmz, zone, bio,
>> +					       chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * This is an unaligned write in a sequential zone:
>>   	 * use buffered write.
>>   	 */
>> -	return dmz_handle_buffered_write(dmz, zone, bio, chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>> +	return dmz_handle_buffered_write(dmz, zone, bio,
>> +					 chunk_block, nr_blocks);
>>   }
>>   
>>   /*
>> @@ -383,7 +398,6 @@ static int dmz_handle_discard(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_zone *zone,
>>   static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
>>   			   struct bio *bio)
>>   {
>> -	struct dmz_bioctx *bioctx = dm_per_bio_data(bio, sizeof(struct dmz_bioctx));
>>   	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = dmz->metadata;
>>   	struct dm_zone *zone;
>>   	int ret;
>> @@ -397,11 +411,6 @@ static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
>>   
>>   	dmz_lock_metadata(zmd);
>>   
>> -	if (dmz->dev->flags & DMZ_BDEV_DYING) {
>> -		ret = -EIO;
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
> 
> Are you removing this because you added the check to dmz_submit_bio() ?
> 
Yes.

>> -
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Get the data zone mapping the chunk. There may be no
>>   	 * mapping for read and discard. If a mapping is obtained,
>> @@ -415,10 +424,8 @@ static void dmz_handle_bio(struct dmz_target *dmz, struct dm_chunk_work *cw,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* Process the BIO */
>> -	if (zone) {
>> +	if (zone)
>>   		dmz_activate_zone(zone);
>> -		bioctx->zone = zone;
> 
> Why are you removing this ? This is used in dmz_bio_endio()...
> 
> 
Bzzt. Indeed, you are correct. Will be fixing it up for the next round.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare at suse.de                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer





More information about the dm-devel mailing list