[dm-devel] dm writecache: fix data corruption when reloading the target

[Mike Snitzer]

On Wed, Apr 08 2020 at  3:02pm -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com> wrote:

> The dm-writecache reads metadata in the target constructor. However, when 
> we reload the target, there could be another active instance running on 
> the same device. This is the sequence of operations when doing a reload:
> 
> 1. construct new target
> 2. suspend old target
> 3. resume new target
> 4. destroy old target
> 
> Metadata that were written by the old target between steps 1 and 2 would
> not be visible by the new target.
> 
> This patch fixes the data corruption by loading the metadata in the resume
> handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org	# v4.18+
> Fixes: 48debafe4f2f ("dm: add writecache target")
> 
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-writecache.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c	2020-04-08 14:47:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c	2020-04-08 20:59:15.000000000 +0200
> @@ -931,6 +931,24 @@ static int writecache_alloc_entries(stru
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int writecache_read_metadata(struct dm_writecache *wc, sector_t n_sectors)
> +{
> +	struct dm_io_region region;
> +	struct dm_io_request req;
> +
> +	region.bdev = wc->ssd_dev->bdev;
> +	region.sector = wc->start_sector;
> +	region.count = wc->metadata_sectors;
> +	req.bi_op = REQ_OP_READ;
> +	req.bi_op_flags = REQ_SYNC;
> +	req.mem.type = DM_IO_VMA;
> +	req.mem.ptr.vma = (char *)wc->memory_map;
> +	req.client = wc->dm_io;
> +	req.notify.fn = NULL;
> +
> +	return dm_io(&req, 1, &region, NULL);
> +}
> +

You aren't using the passed n_sectors (for region.count?)


>  static void writecache_resume(struct dm_target *ti)
>  {
>  	struct dm_writecache *wc = ti->private;
> @@ -941,8 +959,16 @@ static void writecache_resume(struct dm_
>  
>  	wc_lock(wc);
>  
> -	if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc))
> +	if (WC_MODE_PMEM(wc)) {
>  		persistent_memory_invalidate_cache(wc->memory_map, wc->memory_map_size);
> +	} else {
> +		r = writecache_read_metadata(wc, wc->metadata_sectors);
> +		if (r) {
> +			writecache_error(wc, r, "unable to read metadata: %d", r);
> +			memset((char *)wc->memory_map + offsetof(struct wc_memory_superblock, entries), -1,
> +			       (wc->metadata_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT) - offsetof(struct wc_memory_superblock, entries));
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	wc->tree = RB_ROOT;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wc->lru);
> @@ -2200,8 +2226,6 @@ invalid_optional:
>  			goto bad;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		struct dm_io_region region;
> -		struct dm_io_request req;
>  		size_t n_blocks, n_metadata_blocks;
>  		uint64_t n_bitmap_bits;
>  
> @@ -2258,17 +2282,9 @@ invalid_optional:
>  			goto bad;
>  		}
>  
> -		region.bdev = wc->ssd_dev->bdev;
> -		region.sector = wc->start_sector;
> -		region.count = wc->metadata_sectors;
> -		req.bi_op = REQ_OP_READ;
> -		req.bi_op_flags = REQ_SYNC;
> -		req.mem.type = DM_IO_VMA;
> -		req.mem.ptr.vma = (char *)wc->memory_map;
> -		req.client = wc->dm_io;
> -		req.notify.fn = NULL;
> -
> -		r = dm_io(&req, 1, &region, NULL);
> +		r = writecache_read_metadata(wc,
> +			min((sector_t)bdev_logical_block_size(wc->ssd_dev->bdev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT,
> +			    (sector_t)wc->metadata_sectors));

Can you explain why this is needed?  Why isn't wc->metadata_sectors
already compatible with wc->ssd_dev->bdev ?

Yet you just use wc->metadata_sectors in the new call to
writecache_read_metadata() in writecache_resume()...

Mike