[dm-devel] [PATCH 5/7] dm-integrity: change the size of the device
Mikulas Patocka
mpatocka at redhat.com
Sun Mar 22 19:42:25 UTC 2020
If the size of the underlying device changes, we want to change the size
of the integrity device too.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c 2020-03-20 17:39:47.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c 2020-03-20 17:39:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -2833,8 +2833,26 @@ static void dm_integrity_resume(struct d
{
struct dm_integrity_c *ic = (struct dm_integrity_c *)ti->private;
int r;
+ __u64 old_provided_data_sectors = le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->provided_data_sectors);
DEBUG_print("resume\n");
+ if (ic->provided_data_sectors != old_provided_data_sectors) {
+ if (ic->provided_data_sectors > old_provided_data_sectors &&
+ ic->mode == 'B' &&
+ ic->sb->log2_blocks_per_bitmap_bit == ic->log2_blocks_per_bitmap_bit) {
+ rw_journal_sectors(ic, REQ_OP_READ, 0, 0,
+ ic->n_bitmap_blocks * (BITMAP_BLOCK_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT), NULL);
+ block_bitmap_op(ic, ic->journal, old_provided_data_sectors, ic->provided_data_sectors - old_provided_data_sectors, BITMAP_OP_SET);
+ rw_journal_sectors(ic, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_FUA | REQ_SYNC, 0,
+ ic->n_bitmap_blocks * (BITMAP_BLOCK_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT), NULL);
+ }
+
+ ic->sb->provided_data_sectors = cpu_to_le64(ic->provided_data_sectors);
+ r = sync_rw_sb(ic, REQ_OP_WRITE, REQ_FUA);
+ if (unlikely(r))
+ dm_integrity_io_error(ic, "writing superblock", r);
+ }
+
if (ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_DIRTY_BITMAP)) {
DEBUG_print("resume dirty_bitmap\n");
rw_journal_sectors(ic, REQ_OP_READ, 0, 0,
@@ -3937,16 +3955,16 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_ta
goto bad;
}
}
- ic->provided_data_sectors = le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->provided_data_sectors);
- if (ic->provided_data_sectors != le64_to_cpu(ic->sb->provided_data_sectors)) {
- /* test for overflow */
+ if (!!(ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_HAVE_JOURNAL_MAC)) != !!ic->journal_mac_alg.alg_string) {
r = -EINVAL;
- ti->error = "The superblock has 64-bit device size, but the kernel was compiled with 32-bit sectors";
+ ti->error = "Journal mac mismatch";
goto bad;
}
- if (!!(ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_HAVE_JOURNAL_MAC)) != !!ic->journal_mac_alg.alg_string) {
+
+ get_provided_data_sectors(ic);
+ if (!ic->provided_data_sectors) {
r = -EINVAL;
- ti->error = "Journal mac mismatch";
+ ti->error = "The device is too small";
goto bad;
}
@@ -4218,7 +4236,7 @@ static void dm_integrity_dtr(struct dm_t
static struct target_type integrity_target = {
.name = "integrity",
- .version = {1, 5, 0},
+ .version = {1, 6, 0},
.module = THIS_MODULE,
.features = DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_INTEGRITY,
.ctr = dm_integrity_ctr,
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list