[dm-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] multipath: path validation library prep work
Martin Wilck
martin.wilck at suse.com
Tue May 19 12:55:05 UTC 2020
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 23:57 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> I've been playing around with the SID code more and I've decided to
> hold
> off on submitting the library until I have it working with the SID
> multipath module better. Instead, I've pulled out the common code
> thatremember_cmdline_wwid
> multipath -u/-c and the library can use, and put it into
> libmultipath.
>
> I've also removed some of the ordering differences between the
> existing
> code and my new code. Right now, the only difference is that if a
> path
> is currently multipathed, it will always be claimed as a valid path.
>
> Patches 0001 & 0002 are the same as in my "RFC PATCH v2" set, and
> patch
> 0005 is the same as my "libmultipath: simplify failed wwid code"
> patch.
>
> Only patches 0003 and 0004 haven't been posted before.
>
> Changes from v1:
> 0003: Minor fixes suggested by Martin Wilck
> 0004: Fixed typo, added tests for filter_property() and switched some
> tests to pass the check_multipathd code in various ways,
> instead
> of skipping it, as suggested by Martin Wilck
>
This set (v2) doesn't apply cleanly to upstream, neither with or
without my late patches. It's been generated against a tree that
included "Make multipath add wwids from kernel cmdline mpath.wwids with
-A" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4445691/). From my series, it's
missing "libmultipath: move libsg into libmultipath".
Apart from that, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg GF: Felix
Imendörffer
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list