[dm-devel] [PATCH] md: dm-writeback: add __noreturn to BUG-ging function

[Christian Borntraeger]

On 13.11.20 23:52, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Building on arch/s390/ flags this as an error, so add the
> __noreturn attribute modifier to prevent the build error.
> 
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c: In function 'persistent_memory_claim':
> ../drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:323:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]

ok with me, but I am asking why

the unreachable macro is not good enough. For x86 it obviously is.

form arch/s390/include/asm/bug.h
#define BUG() do {                                      \
        __EMIT_BUG(0);                                  \
        unreachable();                                  \
} while (0)


> 
> Fixes: 48debafe4f2f ("dm: add writecache target")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk at redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer at redhat.com>
> Cc: dm-devel at redhat.com
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca at linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor at linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390 at vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-writecache.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-next-20201113.orig/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> +++ linux-next-20201113/drivers/md/dm-writecache.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ err1:
>  	return r;
>  }
>  #else
> -static int persistent_memory_claim(struct dm_writecache *wc)
> +static int __noreturn persistent_memory_claim(struct dm_writecache *wc)
>  {
>  	BUG();
>  }
>