[dm-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for bitfield unit tests
Benjamin Marzinski
bmarzins at redhat.com
Tue Sep 15 16:52:18 UTC 2020
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:16:19PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 00:42 +0200, mwilck at suse.com wrote:
> > From: Martin Wilck <mwilck at suse.com>
> >
> > Hi Christophe, hi Ben,
> >
> > embarassingly, it turns out that my unit test code for the bitfield
> > code was broken in various ways, which at the same time shows that
> > I didn't test this as broadly as I should have before submitting.
> > The good news is that only the test code was broken, not the
> > implementation itself.
> >
> > With these fixes, I successfully compiled it on both little and
> > big endian architectures, with and without glibc 2.27.
> > (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/multipath-tools)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
> > Martin Wilck (3):
> > multipath-tools tests: fix bitfield tests for small fields
> > multipath-tools tests: fix bitfield tests for big endian
> > multipath-tools tests: fix small bitfield tests for big endian
> >
> > tests/util.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > --
> > 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> @Ben: Gentle review reminder ...
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins at redhat.com>
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
>
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list