[dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-raid: stack limits instead of overwriting them.

John Dorminy jdorminy at redhat.com
Thu Sep 24 16:45:43 UTC 2020


I don't understand how this works...

Can chunk_size_bytes be 0? If not, how is discard_granularity being set to 0?

I think also limits is local to the ti in question here, initialized
by blk_set_stacking_limits() via dm-table.c, and therefore has only
default values and not anything to do with the underlying queue. So
setting discard_granularity=max(discard_granularity, chunk_size_bytes)
doesn't seem like it should be working, unless I'm not understanding
what it's there for...

And shouldn't melding in the target's desired io_hints into the
existing queue limits be happening in blk_stack_limits() instead?
(Also, it does lcm_not_zero() for stacking granularity, instead of
max()...)


On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:29 PM Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes a warning WARN_ON_ONCE(!q->limits.discard_granularity).
> The reason is that the function raid_io_hints overwrote
> limits->discard_granularity with zero. We need to properly stack the
> limits instead of overwriting them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-raid.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid.c 2020-09-24 18:16:45.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid.c      2020-09-24 18:16:45.000000000 +0200
> @@ -3734,8 +3734,8 @@ static void raid_io_hints(struct dm_targ
>          * RAID0/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly.
>          */
>         if (rs_is_raid1(rs) || rs_is_raid10(rs)) {
> -               limits->discard_granularity = chunk_size_bytes;
> -               limits->max_discard_sectors = rs->md.chunk_sectors;
> +               limits->discard_granularity = max(limits->discard_granularity, chunk_size_bytes);
> +               limits->max_discard_sectors = min_not_zero(limits->max_discard_sectors, (unsigned)rs->md.chunk_sectors);
>         }
>  }
>
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
>




More information about the dm-devel mailing list