[dm-devel] [PATCH] dm crypt: Avoid percpu_counter spinlock contention in crypt_page_alloc()
Arne Welzel
arne.welzel at corelight.com
Thu Aug 12 19:47:41 UTC 2021
Mikulas,
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
>
thank you for the review. After looking at the submitted patch again,
seems more proper to use >= as the condition:
> > + if (unlikely(percpu_counter_read_positive(&cc->n_allocated_pages) > dm_crypt_pages_per_client) &&
^^
>=
Would it be okay if I resend the patch with this changed and add your
Reviewed-by still? Would also fix some wording in the description and
dedent the perf report output somewhat.
Thanks,
Arne
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list