[dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-bufio: use the acquire memory barrier when testing for B_READ
Mikulas Patocka
mpatocka at redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 14:06:45 UTC 2022
The function test_bit doesn't provide any memory barrier. It may be
possible that the read requests that follow test_bit(B_READING, &b->state)
are reordered before the test, reading invalid data that existed before
B_READING was cleared.
Fix this bug by changing test_bit to test_bit_acquire.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka at redhat.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static void __make_buffer_clean(struct d
{
BUG_ON(b->hold_count);
- if (!b->state) /* fast case */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&b->state)) /* fast case */
return;
wait_on_bit_io(&b->state, B_READING, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *__get_unclaimed
BUG_ON(test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state));
if (static_branch_unlikely(&no_sleep_enabled) && c->no_sleep &&
- unlikely(test_bit(B_READING, &b->state)))
+ unlikely(test_bit_acquire(B_READING, &b->state)))
continue;
if (!b->hold_count) {
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ found_buffer:
* If the user called both dm_bufio_prefetch and dm_bufio_get on
* the same buffer, it would deadlock if we waited.
*/
- if (nf == NF_GET && unlikely(test_bit(B_READING, &b->state)))
+ if (nf == NF_GET && unlikely(test_bit_acquire(B_READING, &b->state)))
return NULL;
b->hold_count++;
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ void dm_bufio_release(struct dm_buffer *
* invalid buffer.
*/
if ((b->read_error || b->write_error) &&
- !test_bit(B_READING, &b->state) &&
+ !test_bit_acquire(B_READING, &b->state) &&
!test_bit(B_WRITING, &b->state) &&
!test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state)) {
__unlink_buffer(b);
@@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_bufio_release_move)
static void forget_buffer_locked(struct dm_buffer *b)
{
- if (likely(!b->hold_count) && likely(!b->state)) {
+ if (likely(!b->hold_count) && likely(!smp_load_acquire(&b->state))) {
__unlink_buffer(b);
__free_buffer_wake(b);
}
@@ -1639,7 +1639,7 @@ static bool __try_evict_buffer(struct dm
{
if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS) ||
(static_branch_unlikely(&no_sleep_enabled) && b->c->no_sleep)) {
- if (test_bit(B_READING, &b->state) ||
+ if (test_bit_acquire(B_READING, &b->state) ||
test_bit(B_WRITING, &b->state) ||
test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state))
return false;
More information about the dm-devel
mailing list